Moderator: Clan Directors




There maybe more strong clans than ever but the clan scene is weaker now than it's ever been. The gap between the top 8 clans and the rest is wider than ever before and that's not healthy. There's also a lack of leaders who want to organise new clans. We used to get 5 or 6 new clans a year, we haven't had that number in the past three !!!! Sadly nothing has been done in the past 2 1/2 to 3 years to try develop / grow clans. There should be more in site advertising for clans and our competitions. Use tournaments to attract potential clan players / leader. Recently Craig25 had a great idea for creating new clans via one of his tournaments. I haven't checked but I hope that it's still in progress. The clan department should reach out to Craig and do everything they can to make that a success.benga wrote:Less clans does not mean low quality.
I would dare to say clans are stronger than they ever were.

Keefie wrote:There maybe more strong clans than ever but the clan scene is weaker now than it's ever been. The gap between the top 8 clans and the rest is wider than ever before and that's not healthy. There's also a lack of leaders who want to organise new clans. We used to get 5 or 6 new clans a year, we haven't had that number in the past three !!!! Sadly nothing has been done in the past 2 1/2 to 3 years to try develop / grow clans. There should be more in site advertising for clans and our competitions. Use tournaments to attract potential clan players / leader. Recently Craig25 had a great idea for creating new clans via one of his tournaments. I haven't checked but I hope that it's still in progress. The clan department should reach out to Craig and do everything they can to make that a success.benga wrote:Less clans does not mean low quality.
I would dare to say clans are stronger than they ever were.
I would love to see the development of a junior clan section. Where small clans between 6 and 10 players could develop and grow without the pressure of 41 game wars. Let the leaders and players have fun without getting smashed up every weak by experienced clans. From these small clans, oak trees may grow.
The policy of the current clan leadership has been to let things tick over and if folk want anything more, then they should organise it themselves. In this time the clan scene has imho stagnated. Maybe it's time for a change of direction, with far more dynamic and exciting leadership coming from this department.

The Clan Department cannot control which Clan Leaders choose to create clans, to remain Clan Leaders, or to leave/dissolve their clan. These decisions can only be made by the Clan World and its members. If more clan members wish to be in larger clans than smaller clans, then who are we to tell them no? We had a discussion back a few years ago in CAT about Active Player Restrictions, but that is something that the Clan Leaders did not want. You cannot have your cake and eat it at the same time.Keefie wrote:There maybe more strong clans than ever but the clan scene is weaker now than it's ever been. The gap between the top 8 clans and the rest is wider than ever before and that's not healthy. There's also a lack of leaders who want to organise new clans.
Maybe back in 2011 this was the case. There have only been 11 recorded new clans since January 1, 2014.Keefie wrote:We used to get 5 or 6 new clans a year, we haven't had that number in the past three !!!!
Nothing has been done at all since you were a part of the CD Team? Two examples:Keefie wrote:Sadly nothing has been done in the past 2 1/2 to 3 years to try develop / grow clans. There should be more in site advertising for clans and our competitions. Use tournaments to attract potential clan players / leader. Recently Craig25 had a great idea for creating new clans via one of his tournaments. I haven't checked but I hope that it's still in progress. The clan department should reach out to Craig and do everything they can to make that a success.
Why don't you create a new topic in CAT or in the general forums to talk about your idea? I would love to discuss a more fleshed-out idea and would love to see the Clan community feedback on it.Keefie wrote:I would love to see the development of a junior clan section. Where small clans between 6 and 10 players could develop and grow without the pressure of 41 game wars. Let the leaders and players have fun without getting smashed up every week by experienced clans. From these small clans, oak trees may grow.
This is where I think your mindset is of old. The CD Team is mainly here to help facilitate, not to completely organize every event. We don't want the Clan World solely reliant upon us for anything. We want to give members in the Clan Community the tools and backing to take ownership and run events, not run all of the events for them.Keefie wrote:The policy of the current clan leadership has been to let things tick over and if folk want anything more, then they should organise it themselves. In this time the clan scene has imho stagnated. Maybe it's time for a change of direction, with far more dynamic and exciting leadership coming from this department.



Not to nitpick, but the CAT Forum wasn't "created" by the current team. It existed as a private space already that was a continuation from long ago (CLA, CD & Friends, CAT) that as Keefie had pointed out, was already discussed and planned to be moved to the public forum and had undergone testing with me & KA to prove the concept worked.Nothing has been done at all since you were a part of the CD Team? Two examples:
What about the creation of CAT, allowing for all Clan Members to see the formal discussions around the direction the Clan Leaders wish to take? What about the creation of CWC? We created a new tournament for the Clan World to participate in, and based off the most recent poll in CAT, the Clan World doesn't want a 2nd edition of this tournament. The Clan World likes CC, CL, and RL, and it has for a long time. Do you really think this is proof that the consensus of Clan World really even wants change?
So on this front, what is being done by the team to facilitate this discussion if its something that'll reap a ton of benefits - why isn't it happening? At the very least, I would think to help the Community the team would lead these sort of "beneficial discussions" and try to get the Community moving in the right direction even if they aren't solely responsible for running the resulting events.The answer to bringing more activity back into the Clan World shouldn't be centered around how many events or things the CD Team can do for the community, but more focused on how we can bring more individuals to become more invested in becoming clan leaders, running events, and generally more active/vocal. That honest discussion would reap a lot of benefit.

He is with a Really Really Good Clan....... OSAMGSteve wrote: but I hear celliottii, the former co-leader of Memento Mori and guy I mentored in The Underworld to get him into Myth, went on to bring most of the best players with him into SoH and others. Not sure where he is today but I bet it's a really good clan.


Sometimes it's not so easy to get people involved in helping to run a clan. I have told my guys that I'm stepping down as leader after Random League, nobody has stepped up. Even if someone had said, I can help if you want, I might be persuaded to stay. Sadly, as it stands Venom, will be social by the end of June.Nut Shot Scott wrote:Thoughts nobody wants:
There are players out there who could and would contribute, probably more than you think. You don't have to be super creative to get them involved but you do have to do something.

So that's unfortunate. This brings up another point. Maybe there needs to be a clan leadership pipeline and everyone needs to be ok with it. For example - nobody in Venom wants to lead but maybe there are one or two players spread across other clans who are ready and able to lead a clan. A resource for that, that doesnt end in someone screaming "poaching!!!", might be a good idea. Just a thought. It's in everyone's best interest to have a good number of clans active. The more the merrier.Keefie wrote:Excellent post mate
Sometimes it's not so easy to get people involved in helping to run a clan. I have told my guys that I'm stepping down as leader after Random League, nobody has stepped up. Even if someone had said, I can help if you want, I might be persuaded to stay. Sadly, as it stands Venom, will be social by the end of June.Nut Shot Scott wrote:Thoughts nobody wants:
There are players out there who could and would contribute, probably more than you think. You don't have to be super creative to get them involved but you do have to do something.

This should not only be implemented...... But Highly Encouraged!Nut Shot Scott wrote:Keefie wrote:Excellent post mate
Nut Shot Scott wrote:Thoughts nobody wants:
This brings up another point. Maybe there needs to be a clan leadership pipeline and everyone needs to be ok with it. For example - nobody in Venom wants to lead but maybe there are one or two players spread across other clans who are ready and able to lead a clan. A resource for that, that doesnt end in someone screaming "poaching!!!", might be a good idea. Just a thought. It's in everyone's best interest to have a good number of clans active. The more the merrier.
willedtowin1 wrote:"poaching!!!"
There....We got that out of the Way

Caymanmew wrote:Here are my ideas...
Spoiler
[b]1)[/b] Open a program in which people can apply and be approved to help lead a clan they are not in. I can't speak for others but I'd be willing to help a clan struggling with leadership and war planning. but I am not willing to leave my own clan to do so. If I could temporarily join a clan and help run their war for them (without playing any games) I would. I wouldn't run it like I run wars for ATL in terms of research and planning, but for a lot of clans, even doing the bare minimum is too much. A clan like Venom (and many others) wouldn't have to die completely. [b]2)[/b] Focus on making the clan would fun for everyone. The reality of the current system is the top clans kick everyone's ass. Mid to bottom-tier clans exist openly solely to lose to top clans. They have no hope of winning basically any event they join and must rely on casual wars for actual close competition. Think of Conquers Cup, did it really matter if we had more than 10 clans sign up for this year? Outside the top 10 everyone else got completely stomped. Like why even play stomped. Half the clan world joined so they could lose by 20+ games... next, they will join CL13 and get dominated in SD, those unlucky enough to actually do decent will be rewarded by going into PD the following year to have their teeth kicked in... I am sure many of us play beer league-type sports... if half the league was pro's you probably wouldn't want to play in that league anymore... It is why, in my experience, the bad teams in beer leagues tend not to come back the next year or if they do have to replace 75% of their players. [b]3)[/b] Actively pursue potential clan leaders and try to help grow clans. Has anyone on the CD's contacted Craig23? He said he was interested in clans but he also clearly did not know much about them. As the leaders of the clan world, the CD's should be trying to help him and others who show interest or potential get involved. How about RA? Violet has been off-site since December, has anyone contacted them to see if any of their members would be willing to step up as a leader? Maybe Silly Knig-it would? He is quite active within the tournament organizing scene, maybe he wouldn't be interested but if no attempt has been made to reactive them then that is kind of sad.




As a discussion with BigWham once went along that lines, and the answer was - so whats stopping you from doing that now?All of this. No offense - really, none at all meant here - but I'm pretty sure if you gave me about three days, the ability to do a few things, and some willing people, we could get an outline for something pretty cool.
Definitely, its a lot of work needed, time to put in, and effort to lead by example.Enthusiasms is one thing...... Commitment to succeed is another.
