saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Unlike the rabbit I have no pressing need to click a link described as, "men's g-string" and "P.S. he has a hot body." but as a morbidly obese man I suspect I wouldn't wear them because women don't typically care about my apearance. So I pick garments based on comfort and durability. I'm guessing these have niether of those atributes.
Yes, men's g-strings. That's not the point - look at the design. It's insane. WHY WOULD ANYONE WEAR THAT.
The three strings seem a bit...overdone. (Which would be precisely the same comment I would use if this were a female g-string.)
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
KoolBak wrote:Hell no (unless my wife bribed me to...lol).
And WTF were you doing looking that up in the first place? Was your search criteria "something to make my boyfriend hot"?!?!
I normally look them up just for the lols, as the designs of them are quite hilarious. (Seriously, if you don't believe me, look them up yourself (don't let your wife catch you though, that might seem awkward)).
My boyfriend won't wear them =[
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "