Moderator: Community Team

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Wrong!Symmetry wrote:Lady Mormont
Pros: Already a leader, makes the Starks at that age look like wolf-nannied wimps.
Cons: Young, Not magic.
WILLIAMS5232 wrote: as far as dukasaur goes, i had no idea you were so goofy. i mean, you hate your parents so much you'd wish they'd been shot? just move out bro.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
WILLIAMS5232 wrote: as far as dukasaur goes, i had no idea you were so goofy. i mean, you hate your parents so much you'd wish they'd been shot? just move out bro.
She's probably the most ruthless of the contenders. She really doesn't know how to make friends though, or to get anyone to do anything but a kind of Machiavellian fear. She's no Trump though. I think the comparison somehow does a disservice to both of them.mookiemcgee wrote:My official opinion (though the bad guys never win) is Cersei. She's earned it through smart governance and deal making.
She is the Donald Trump of GOT. Make deals with your enemies and break them. Make deals with your allies and break them. Put Cersei first over all others. Threaten to put all your opponents in jail (or murder em)
Tyrion is a Targaryen? The dragons weren't big fans of his, to be fair.Dukasaur wrote:Why should there be an Iron Throne at all? It has always represented nothing but imperialist exploitation by the Targaryens. Why should the nations of Westeros not throw off their shackles and become a loose confederacy of self-governing states? Saw the Iron Throne into segments and let every nation take home a segment, to be displayed in their central town square as a reminder of what evil looks like. You might say this is too idealistic for the time, but remember that institutions like the Swiss Confederacy were born in our medieval age, out of similar circumstances.
If you must have one ruler, my vote is for Sansa Stark. She has no major cons. Yes, she was a foolish and shallow girl before the War. That's natural for a 14-year old. As she has matured, she has gained wisdom at a tremendous pace. She's shown herself to be a good and competent ruler since taking over Winterfell, and still very young. She's suffered a lot, but not enough to make her bitter and full of hate. As far as legalisms go, Sansa's marriage to Tyrion was never consummated but also never annulled. If, as I think there are very strong indications, Tyrion is a Targaryen, consummating that marriage might be the missing ingredient needed. It could be a personal union of North and South, in the style of Ferdinand and Isabela in our world.
Not taking anything away from her. She was a fine young lady, inherited a lot of heavy responsibility very young and handled it well.Symmetry wrote:Tyrion is a Targaryen? The dragons weren't big fans of his, to be fair.Dukasaur wrote:Why should there be an Iron Throne at all? It has always represented nothing but imperialist exploitation by the Targaryens. Why should the nations of Westeros not throw off their shackles and become a loose confederacy of self-governing states? Saw the Iron Throne into segments and let every nation take home a segment, to be displayed in their central town square as a reminder of what evil looks like. You might say this is too idealistic for the time, but remember that institutions like the Swiss Confederacy were born in our medieval age, out of similar circumstances.
If you must have one ruler, my vote is for Sansa Stark. She has no major cons. Yes, she was a foolish and shallow girl before the War. That's natural for a 14-year old. As she has matured, she has gained wisdom at a tremendous pace. She's shown herself to be a good and competent ruler since taking over Winterfell, and still very young. She's suffered a lot, but not enough to make her bitter and full of hate. As far as legalisms go, Sansa's marriage to Tyrion was never consummated but also never annulled. If, as I think there are very strong indications, Tyrion is a Targaryen, consummating that marriage might be the missing ingredient needed. It could be a personal union of North and South, in the style of Ferdinand and Isabela in our world.
In spite of the events of the last episode, I'm still in the pro- Lady Mormont faction.
How is this not a serious reply?Symmetry wrote:Hmm, so no serious reply to the Lady Mormont question- as people who actually watch the show know, she was brought back from the dead. As my new face tattoo says "12134Life"
She hasn't been brought back to life. Like the other casualties in the Battle of Winterfell, she rose when the Night King summoned the dead. That would make her a wight. Not alive, but animated dead, in the norms of mythology. In any case, that too has been taken away from her; when the Night King died all the wights went back to being fully dead.Not taking anything away from her. She was a fine young lady, inherited a lot of heavy responsibility very young and handled it well.
It's pretty funny -- he had one lapse of judgement and all of a sudden everybody's calling him a moron. The audience is pretty fickle. A year ago everybody was calling him the smartest man in the entire GoT universe. It's as if Rocky Marciano lost one fight and everybody started calling him a loser.Symmetry wrote:Tyrion has been kind of a moron for the last few seasons. Him being the one true Targaeryen would just be dumb.
Quick question- can you pick one piece of advice that Tyrion has given as the hand to Daenerys apart from trusting Jon about the dead folk that was a good idea?Dukasaur wrote:How is this not a serious reply?Symmetry wrote:Hmm, so no serious reply to the Lady Mormont question- as people who actually watch the show know, she was brought back from the dead. As my new face tattoo says "12134Life"She hasn't been brought back to life. Like the other casualties in the Battle of Winterfell, she rose when the Night King summoned the dead. That would make her a wight. Not alive, but animated dead, in the norms of mythology. In any case, that too has been taken away from her; when the Night King died all the wights went back to being fully dead.Not taking anything away from her. She was a fine young lady, inherited a lot of heavy responsibility very young and handled it well.
It's pretty funny -- he had one lapse of judgement and all of a sudden everybody's calling him a moron. The audience is pretty fickle. A year ago everybody was calling him the smartest man in the entire GoT universe. It's as if Rocky Marciano lost one fight and everybody started calling him a loser.Symmetry wrote:Tyrion has been kind of a moron for the last few seasons. Him being the one true Targaeryen would just be dumb.
In any case, nobody is saying he's the one true Targaryen. He is a Targaryen bastard; that makes him at best third-in-line, and possibly even lower.
I really think there could have been a few subtle things that Littlefinger could have done that would have helped him win the Iron Throne.thegreekdog wrote:Up until recently, I thought Littlefinger deserved the throne; he rose the farthest and the fastest. Unfortunately, he was murdered without trial by those unhinged northerners.
As far as who is deserving, of the people still left alive, the best player is Cersei.
Au contraire, Cersei is a hopeless basketcase. With each action, her world gets smaller and smaller. She lost the North early on, the South soon afterward. She lost the support of the Faith, of the Citadel, of the economic heartlands of the Reach and the Riverlands. She's burned up most of the Lannister army through death or desertion and hasn't really any way of replacing the losses. She's lost Casterly Rock and all the Lannister commercial empire. All the best minds have left the capital. She's massively in debt and has doubled down and gone deeper into debt to gamble on retaking what she's lost. It can't work, economically speaking. The only territory she really holds is King's Landing and its immediate hinterlands. It has no real economic base. It was always subsidized through a plunder economy, and with so much of Westoros in waste, there's not much left to plunder. It won't be long before she's down in the Fuhrer-bunker with nobody except Qyburn and the remnants of the Mountain.thegreekdog wrote:Up until recently, I thought Littlefinger deserved the throne; he rose the farthest and the fastest. Unfortunately, he was murdered without trial by those unhinged northerners.
As far as who is deserving, of the people still left alive, the best player is Cersei.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
I think I was confused about the question. If the question is who "deserves" the Iron Throne outside of the context of who has played the game the best, I would say one of Dany, Jon, or Gendry, in no particular order, given that all three of them have royal blood.Symmetry wrote:I really think there could have been a few subtle things that Littlefinger could have done that would have helped him win the Iron Throne.thegreekdog wrote:Up until recently, I thought Littlefinger deserved the throne; he rose the farthest and the fastest. Unfortunately, he was murdered without trial by those unhinged northerners.
As far as who is deserving, of the people still left alive, the best player is Cersei.
Things he could have tried
1) Not being a pimp who ran the biggest brothel in Kings Landing
2) Not explained all of his plots to all the prostitutes in said brothel during prostitute training sessions
3) Not hit on the daughter of his ex. (Bojack Horseman much?)
4) Did he kill a kid? Seems like a lot of people just straight out murder kids. He probably killed that weird kid. I forget, but he probably shouldn't have if he did.
5) Not sold Sansa to a house whose banner is about skinning people (See exhibit A)
Exhibit A:
No offence, of course, to anyone with SS in their name.

Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.