Tournament Medals Categorization
Posted: Sat Nov 16, 2013 10:54 pm
I would like to gauge interest with this before actually drawing up something officially.
So as some of you know, I run pretty extensive tournaments. It feels like some of my first few are endless, with some quick 16 participants tourneys passing them up and finishing before the other tournaments are done with round 1!
I know that it is your choice on what tournament you run, but honestly- I don't feel I should be getting the same "rewards" for my insane, suicidal efforts. With 32 player single elimination, you have a little over 30 games over the course of the tourney. In some of my tournaments now, I've had more than that in the first round. One tournament I'm holding now is expected to reach way over 3,000 UNIQUE GAMES, possibly even 5K (I don't want to bother with math that high) That's right folks, 3 Thousand to 5 thousand. It will hit 1 thousand by round 4.
Now wait a minute... 3000+, 30+... What is going on here? How is it fair that they get the same recognition?
So here is my proposal: a secondary medal will be created for "extraordinary tournament contribution". We can have applications upon tournament start to receive it with the completion of the tournament, and those can be approved/rejected. The standards can be discussed later in this thread. But it would be fair to keep in mind that 1v1 is not the same as 12 player games, so standards would need to be different.
A Tournament besides mine that would qualify for this (only one I can think of ATM) is Kenny777's and hopalong's Terminator Escalating 219 or bust. I think they will end up near 500 6 player games, not totally sure on that.
So please, discuss, and give some good feedback. I've got a poll up, so be sure to vote as we'll.
I just want to note- this is a possibility I've been toying with in my head for a while. I personally don't care either way this goes, I run tournaments for community benefit, not for shiny medals (or else I would do the 16 player SE a lot). I just want to be fair for others who do these extreme tournaments as well (if they exist, maybe there is a reason they don't...)
So as some of you know, I run pretty extensive tournaments. It feels like some of my first few are endless, with some quick 16 participants tourneys passing them up and finishing before the other tournaments are done with round 1!
I know that it is your choice on what tournament you run, but honestly- I don't feel I should be getting the same "rewards" for my insane, suicidal efforts. With 32 player single elimination, you have a little over 30 games over the course of the tourney. In some of my tournaments now, I've had more than that in the first round. One tournament I'm holding now is expected to reach way over 3,000 UNIQUE GAMES, possibly even 5K (I don't want to bother with math that high) That's right folks, 3 Thousand to 5 thousand. It will hit 1 thousand by round 4.
Now wait a minute... 3000+, 30+... What is going on here? How is it fair that they get the same recognition?
So here is my proposal: a secondary medal will be created for "extraordinary tournament contribution". We can have applications upon tournament start to receive it with the completion of the tournament, and those can be approved/rejected. The standards can be discussed later in this thread. But it would be fair to keep in mind that 1v1 is not the same as 12 player games, so standards would need to be different.
A Tournament besides mine that would qualify for this (only one I can think of ATM) is Kenny777's and hopalong's Terminator Escalating 219 or bust. I think they will end up near 500 6 player games, not totally sure on that.
So please, discuss, and give some good feedback. I've got a poll up, so be sure to vote as we'll.
I just want to note- this is a possibility I've been toying with in my head for a while. I personally don't care either way this goes, I run tournaments for community benefit, not for shiny medals (or else I would do the 16 player SE a lot). I just want to be fair for others who do these extreme tournaments as well (if they exist, maybe there is a reason they don't...)