Moderator: Community Team

The largest portion of people that browse the web are typically teenagers. If you are going to ask "is it true that the majority of users are acting at what maturity level I just stated I expect them to act?", then it sounded pretty dumb to me.Kotaro wrote:I would like to request that, whatever weird sand monsters have been invading the anal holes of all users to make them super pissy 24/7, to stop their rampage.
Seriously people, this is a game; why all the anger? Are all of you really teenage to adolescent kids, or have adults just not grown up?
ALL CAPS FTW!!!Kotaro wrote:ALL CAPS BTW

WHAT?Kotaro wrote:I KNEW IT
ALL CAPS BTW
'piece' not 'peace'Stephen Wayne wrote:hello we are online playing games
every one here is a worthless peace of shit
no one here is in any way mature
Yeah man, you're totally right! f*ck all those guys who give you less than five whole fucking stars for attitude just because you didn't respond to their stupid fucking gl which wasn't even worthy of being called conversation anyway! Screw those guys, then need to stop being so pissy!Kotaro wrote:Seriously people, this is a game; why all the anger? Are all of you really teenage to adolescent kids, or have adults just not grown up?
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
unfortunately, neither you nor owen started it, therefore its fair game in GDDancing Mustard wrote:Also two, this thread really ought to have been moved to FW the moment it was posted.
Oh but of course! Silly me for forgetting that some users are more equal than others here.whitestazn88 wrote:unfortunately, neither you nor owen started it, therefore its fair game in GDDancing Mustard wrote:Also two, this thread really ought to have been moved to FW the moment it was posted.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
wait til pc9 rolls out the "f*** you owen" thread, and it'll probably hit 9 pages before owen finally gives in, leaves a comment asking him to stop, gets banned for baiting, and the thread gets sent into forum hell aka FWDancing Mustard wrote:Oh but of course! Silly me for forgetting that some users are more equal than others here.whitestazn88 wrote:unfortunately, neither you nor owen started it, therefore its fair game in GDDancing Mustard wrote:Also two, this thread really ought to have been moved to FW the moment it was posted.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Well that's a relief, I think I got 30 in yesterday, so I should be fine for today, right?Dancing Mustard wrote:Yeah.
Or wait till JR24 (/other homogenous rank-carer) rolls out another "well done me for getting more risk-points", or a "well done uninteresting rank-carer X for achieving rank Y". That'll be greeted with open arms and clapping smileys, because apparently circle-jerking with your friends is relevant and interesting if you've got lots of risk points and every single one of their small score-fluctuations is worthy of its own seperate thread of bland "well done X" posts and smiley-walls.
But when Pimpdave makes a "well done user Z for attaining rank lower than Y" thread it'll be instantly locked and he'll be warned for spamming. Because making threads whenever your friends change ranks is a serious breach of forum guidelines if you personally don't have a lot of risk points, or if your friend's don't have as many risk points as the people who spend their time here whinging about the dic... sorry, 'assault cubes'.
But don't complain about it. Because pointing that kind of bullshit and double-standards out is spam or trolling if you don't make 30+ dull GD posts per day.
Yes, some users are given more credit then others. Especially when one person can't make a single post without throwing "f*ck this and f*ck that and I have the maturity of a 3 year old" in every single thread they make. My thread about being silent and getting negative ratings was perfectly valid, because it was a discussion thread. This one is valid as well, because it's discussing the rising immaturity levels at this site, not to mention the fact that people seem to be unable to stay on topic, whether or not they have the brain capacity to. Notice, in that other thread, not a single person who was discussing it had "f*ck" in any of their sentences, let alone every single one.Dancing Mustard wrote: Oh but of course! Silly me for forgetting that some users are more equal than others here.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
I like your avatar, it is interesting.cena-rules wrote:OOOOOOOOOOOOH
THIS THREAD IS ABOUT ME!!!!!!
yayz!
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.