Moderator: Community Team
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
and then becoming more dependent on foreign energy, has been my #1 issue since I was able to vote.we need to become energy independent
And when they aren't operated properly...strike wolf wrote:Nuclear power plants are controversial because of the issues that anything with Nuclear in front of it has had in the past, from nuclear bombs to Chernobyl. However if you look at the stats when Nuclear power plants are operated properly they are very safe and efficient ways of producing energy.
sully800 wrote:And when they aren't operated properly...strike wolf wrote:Nuclear power plants are controversial because of the issues that anything with Nuclear in front of it has had in the past, from nuclear bombs to Chernobyl. However if you look at the stats when Nuclear power plants are operated properly they are very safe and efficient ways of producing energy.
Me neither. Shit, THERE IS A HIGHER CHANCE OF YOU GETTING RUN OVER RIGHT NOW.Frigidus wrote:I'd literally take a nuclear power plant in my backyard if it was big enough. I'm not one to flee from .001% risks.
so... will you be voting obama next time then?Phatscotty wrote:I really hope this comes to pass. Every president in my lifetime, getting up there and saying
and then becoming more dependent on foreign energy, has been my #1 issue since I was able to vote.we need to become energy independent
Carter, Oval address on Energy, 1977
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tPePpMxJaA
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
The underground cellars in remote mountains will gladly take them.Neoteny wrote:AFAIK the issue with nuclear power has little to do with the actual plants, and more to do with disposal. Sure we might be ok with a plant in our backyard, but who wants the spent rods?
In that respect, I don't really want to be driving next to a truck hauling nuclear waste, although I don't know of any good solution to that. Anyway, we need more nuclear power.underground cellars in remote mountains
Getting there via highway, last I understood...BigBallinStalin wrote:The underground cellars in remote mountains will gladly take them.Neoteny wrote:AFAIK the issue with nuclear power has little to do with the actual plants, and more to do with disposal. Sure we might be ok with a plant in our backyard, but who wants the spent rods?
that's why you need to make sure you hire the right people for the job. everybody in there needs to have expansive training for it before they begin and the person in charge better know what he's damn wel ldoing. Anything in the wrong hands is dangerous, that's why you put it in the right hands.sully800 wrote:And when they aren't operated properly...strike wolf wrote:Nuclear power plants are controversial because of the issues that anything with Nuclear in front of it has had in the past, from nuclear bombs to Chernobyl. However if you look at the stats when Nuclear power plants are operated properly they are very safe and efficient ways of producing energy.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Anything put into the wrong hands is dangerous. Admittedly nuclear power is much more dangerous than most but I am in no way suggesting we give it to just anybody to run. I'm talking aobut trained professionals who know what they're doing.sully800 wrote:And when they aren't operated properly...strike wolf wrote:Nuclear power plants are controversial because of the issues that anything with Nuclear in front of it has had in the past, from nuclear bombs to Chernobyl. However if you look at the stats when Nuclear power plants are operated properly they are very safe and efficient ways of producing energy.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
And the issue is not only people-oriented; there are ecological concerns as well. Mountains have ecosystems too, and if those cellars fail, water goes a long way...BigBallinStalin wrote:The underground cellars in remote mountains will gladly take them.Neoteny wrote:AFAIK the issue with nuclear power has little to do with the actual plants, and more to do with disposal. Sure we might be ok with a plant in our backyard, but who wants the spent rods?
Usually by a massive military convoy.Woodruff wrote:Getting there via highway, last I understood...BigBallinStalin wrote:The underground cellars in remote mountains will gladly take them.Neoteny wrote:AFAIK the issue with nuclear power has little to do with the actual plants, and more to do with disposal. Sure we might be ok with a plant in our backyard, but who wants the spent rods?
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Savannah River Site. In my neck o' the woods. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savannah_River_Sitesully800 wrote:So do the nuclear power plants on the East coast also transport the nuclear waste to Colorado via highway? I'm not asking to be snide, it's something I had never really considered before. It seems like an awful long way to be transporting such material, but there's not many other options for disposing of the stuff.

This isn't true. I work in logistics for one of the biggest manufacturers of power generation equipment, including nuclear power. We ship enriched uranium and other nuclear material frequently. It isn't carried by the military. It is transported by private carriers. They do have to have specialized training and certification in order to do it, but it's not nearly as covert and hardcore as people think.Neoteny wrote:Usually by a massive military convoy.Getting there via highway, last I understood...

Wow...didn't want to let this one slide...try typing Bush nuclear energy policy in google. Lefties and environmentalists were strongly against it. There has been no huge advance in tech since 2005, yet when the messiah Obama says Clean nuclear all the Obamaheads get their dicks hard. You have proven to be an idiot yet again.pimpdave wrote:Once again, Obama having guts that Bush didn't have.
