Moderator: Community Team
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
we need to become energy independent
strike wolf wrote:Nuclear power plants are controversial because of the issues that anything with Nuclear in front of it has had in the past, from nuclear bombs to Chernobyl. However if you look at the stats when Nuclear power plants are operated properly they are very safe and efficient ways of producing energy.
sully800 wrote:strike wolf wrote:Nuclear power plants are controversial because of the issues that anything with Nuclear in front of it has had in the past, from nuclear bombs to Chernobyl. However if you look at the stats when Nuclear power plants are operated properly they are very safe and efficient ways of producing energy.
And when they aren't operated properly...
Frigidus wrote:I'd literally take a nuclear power plant in my backyard if it was big enough. I'm not one to flee from .001% risks.
Phatscotty wrote:I really hope this comes to pass. Every president in my lifetime, getting up there and sayingwe need to become energy independent
and then becoming more dependent on foreign energy, has been my #1 issue since I was able to vote.
Carter, Oval address on Energy, 1977
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tPePpMxJaA
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Commander9 wrote:Trust Edoc, as I know he's VERY good.
zimmah wrote:Mind like a brick.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Neoteny wrote:AFAIK the issue with nuclear power has little to do with the actual plants, and more to do with disposal. Sure we might be ok with a plant in our backyard, but who wants the spent rods?
In that respect, I don't really want to be driving next to a truck hauling nuclear waste, although I don't know of any good solution to that. Anyway, we need more nuclear power.underground cellars in remote mountains
BigBallinStalin wrote:Neoteny wrote:AFAIK the issue with nuclear power has little to do with the actual plants, and more to do with disposal. Sure we might be ok with a plant in our backyard, but who wants the spent rods?
The underground cellars in remote mountains will gladly take them.
sully800 wrote:strike wolf wrote:Nuclear power plants are controversial because of the issues that anything with Nuclear in front of it has had in the past, from nuclear bombs to Chernobyl. However if you look at the stats when Nuclear power plants are operated properly they are very safe and efficient ways of producing energy.
And when they aren't operated properly...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
sully800 wrote:strike wolf wrote:Nuclear power plants are controversial because of the issues that anything with Nuclear in front of it has had in the past, from nuclear bombs to Chernobyl. However if you look at the stats when Nuclear power plants are operated properly they are very safe and efficient ways of producing energy.
And when they aren't operated properly...
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Neoteny wrote:AFAIK the issue with nuclear power has little to do with the actual plants, and more to do with disposal. Sure we might be ok with a plant in our backyard, but who wants the spent rods?
The underground cellars in remote mountains will gladly take them.
Woodruff wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Neoteny wrote:AFAIK the issue with nuclear power has little to do with the actual plants, and more to do with disposal. Sure we might be ok with a plant in our backyard, but who wants the spent rods?
The underground cellars in remote mountains will gladly take them.
Getting there via highway, last I understood...
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
sully800 wrote:So do the nuclear power plants on the East coast also transport the nuclear waste to Colorado via highway? I'm not asking to be snide, it's something I had never really considered before. It seems like an awful long way to be transporting such material, but there's not many other options for disposing of the stuff.

Neoteny wrote:Getting there via highway, last I understood...
Usually by a massive military convoy.

pimpdave wrote:Once again, Obama having guts that Bush didn't have.
