what,me worry? wrote:Oh, your current Webster's dictionary lacks words...which means they lack meaning...which means they aren't used cuz they're not real.... Hmm
Unsupremic is a word I took from unsupremacy which is used in the math world
You see, *takes a knee* words are simply utterances that we make when referring to something. This is the basis of linguistics. Furthermore, humans engage in vernacular which then turns into a word in your updated Webster's dicktionary which you'll have to wait for your mother to come into
Ok? Ok.
Good talk
That “word” is not in Webster’s or the Urban Dictionary or anywhere else online.
Words only have meaning when a sufficient number of people ‘agree’ to their meaning.
If you make up a word, and no one else recognizes it... that doesn’t make you smart. It makes you an idiot, because words only have value if your audience understands your meaning.
Sometimes a person can make up a word, like ‘ginormous’... and it works because people can under the meaning without having ever heard the word.
Sometimes a person can make up a word... and use it in context in such a manner that it works.... because the. context will help the listener understand the word.
Your “word” did neither.
Supremacy is a word... unsupremacy probably doesn’t itself qualify, though at least it’s been used before.
Your bastardization of a pseudo word could have value if it was used in proper context.
In context and manner you tried to use it... it fails.
It makes your already clunky run-on sentence sound even worse and make even less sense.
